Food and Farming

The Benefits of a Plant-Based Diet for the Environment

Why foods differ in environmental impact, what research broadly agrees on about plant-based diets, and why farming methods and food choices still matter.

On this page
  1. What “plant-based” means here
  2. Why foods differ in impact
  3. Land and forests
  4. What is well established, and what is not
  5. Water, fertiliser and biodiversity
  6. Health, kept general
  7. Practical ways to shift gradually

What “plant-based” means here

A plant-based diet centres on foods from plants: vegetables, fruit, grains, beans, lentils, nuts and seeds. The term is used in different ways. Some people mean fully vegan eating, others vegetarian, and others simply a diet in which plants make up most of what is on the plate, with some meat, fish or dairy.

This distinction matters because the environmental picture is mostly about degree. You do not have to follow a strict label for your choices to change the footprint of your meals.

Why foods differ in impact

The environmental impact of food comes from several sources: clearing land, running machinery, producing fertiliser, feeding and housing animals, processing, packaging, transport, refrigeration and cooking, along with waste along the way. In many studies of food systems, the stage that matters most is production on the farm, not transport.

Animal products tend to need more resources per unit of food than most plant foods, for a simple reason. Raising an animal means growing feed or providing grazing land for the animal’s whole life, and much of that energy is used by the animal rather than turned into meat or milk. Ruminant animals such as cattle and sheep also produce methane as they digest food, and methane is a potent greenhouse gas. A growing body of research from different groups, using different methods, tends to find the same broad pattern:

  • Beef and lamb typically have the highest greenhouse gas emissions and land use per unit of food.
  • Dairy, pork, poultry and eggs usually fall in the middle, though results vary.
  • Most staple plant foods, such as grains, pulses, potatoes and vegetables, generally sit at the lower end.

Comparisons depend on the measure used, such as per kilogram, per calorie or per gram of protein, and results change somewhat with the choice. Studies also differ on what they count, and that is one reason why methods like life cycle assessment are used to compare products consistently.

Land and forests

Livestock and the crops grown to feed them take up a very large share of agricultural land. Reducing demand for land-hungry foods can, in principle, free up land for nature or for other uses. How far this happens in practice depends on markets, policy and what farmers do next. Land-clearing for farming, including pasture and some crops such as soy, is among the deforestation drivers in some regions, though much of the soy grown globally is used for animal feed rather than direct human consumption. The wider question of sustainable land use is bigger than any diet alone.

What is well established, and what is not

Reasonably well established:

  • On average, diets that include less meat, and especially less beef and lamb, are associated with lower emissions and lower land use than diets rich in them.
  • Within animal foods, there are large differences, so swapping red meat for poultry or legumes usually makes a bigger difference than swapping one type of plant food for another.
  • Waste matters in every diet.

More uncertain or variable:

  • Farming method and location. The same food can have very different impacts depending on how and where it is produced. A lower-impact beef system and a high-impact one can differ widely.
  • Some plant foods have downsides. Flooded rice fields release methane, some tree nuts and fruit need a lot of water in dry regions, and air-freighted fresh produce can have a surprisingly high footprint, because of transport. Palm oil and some crops linked to forest clearing can be damaging depending on sourcing.
  • Processed substitutes. Meat and dairy alternatives often have lower footprints than their animal equivalents, but the range is wide and depends on ingredients and manufacturing.
  • Local effects. Grazing can maintain some grassland habitats and use land that cannot grow crops, so the best choice is not always obvious on a particular farm.

It also helps to keep transport in proportion. The question of food miles is often less important than what the food is and how it was produced.

Water, fertiliser and biodiversity

Water use and pollution also vary. Livestock agriculture can contribute to nutrient runoff through manure and fertiliser used on feed crops. Many plant crops need irrigation too, so the picture depends on region and crop. In general, a diet that relies on fewer inputs per meal has fewer places for those problems to arise, but it is not automatic.

On biodiversity, the largest pressures from farming come from habitat loss and intensive practices. Plant-heavy diets could reduce demand for land, but varied, wildlife-friendly farming methods are important whatever is being grown.

Health, kept general

Many national health bodies describe well-planned diets rich in plants as suitable for most people, but needs vary by age, health condition, pregnancy and life stage. Some nutrients, such as vitamin B12 in fully vegan diets, need particular attention. If you are thinking about a major change, or have a medical condition, speak with a doctor or a registered dietitian. This article is general information, not personal dietary advice.

Practical ways to shift gradually

You do not need to switch overnight. Common approaches include:

  • Eating less meat without overhauling your diet by having a few meat-free days or reducing portion sizes.
  • Starting with meals you already like, such as lentil soups, bean chilli, vegetable curry or pasta with vegetables.
  • Learning to cook with dried pulses, which are inexpensive, store well and take on flavour readily.
  • Choosing the swaps with the largest effect first, such as replacing some beef or lamb, rather than worrying over small items.
  • Wasting less, because discarded food of any kind carries its full footprint.

Cooking choices can add a little too, which is covered in the idea of low-footprint cooking. If you are curious about how your own diet compares, footprint calculators can give a rough picture, though they have limits and should not be treated as exact.

A plant-based diet is a useful lever for reducing food-related emissions and land use, but it is not a guarantee of a low-impact diet. What you buy, how it was grown and how much of it is thrown away all still matter.

The complete guide to food and farming

The Importance of Sustainable Agriculture for a Greener Future
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →